Welcome To CT

My Left Nutmeg

A community-driven blog featuring news and commentary on local, state, and national politics.

helphaiti

Donate to CT Dems
Enable ActBlue
for CT Races
$
John Larson
(1st CD)
$
Joe Courtney
(2nd CD)
$
Rosa DeLauro
(3rd CD)
$
Jim Himes
(4th CD)
$
Chris Murphy
(5th CD)
$
Ads on My Left Nutmeg
 


 
Contact Info
To contact the site admin email ctblogger at ctblogger@yahoo.com

Resources
2007 Legislative "Heroes and Zeroes"
2007 "Worst Republicans In The State"
2007 "Worst Democrats In The State"
CT Congressional Delegation and the Progressive Agenda
CT Clean Elections Funding Explained
Federal Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
State Legislative Advocacy Toolkit
 
 
My Left Nutmeg

Anonymous WTNH Blogger Reaches Stratospheric Levels of Dumb (Updated)

by: tparty

Tue Jul 21, 2009 at 18:03:01 PM EDT


(Updated with response from WTNH below.)

There are so many things completely wrong with this blog post by "ConnPolitics.tv Editor" at WTNH (the one that on first glance looks like the 100 other articles a week written about Chris Dodd's fundraising) that it's hard to know where to start. How about with the first sentence:

Of the 465 itemized individual contributions given to Sen. Chris Dodd's re-election campaign this year, only five Connecticut residents gave a donation to the senator, according to records posted online by the Federal Election Commission.

Wrong, and wrong. There have been many more than 465 itemized individual donations to Dodd this year, including over 100 itemized individual donors from CT in Dodd's second quarter FEC report alone. And 491 donors from CT in the 2Q, if you count donations both above and below the FEC reporting threshold of $200.

On to the second sentence:

The FEC lists Dodd receiving $608,995 in itemized individual contributions between Jan. 1, 2009 and June 30, 2009.

Wrong. The FEC lists Dodd receiving $664k in itemized individual donations in the second quarter alone, in addition to the $608k in itemized individual donations in the first quarter.

There are many more completely false statements that follow, but the big mistake the anonymous WTNH blogger is making quickly becomes apparent. WTNH is breaking this breathless bullshit story using numbers from the first quarter only, because they are apparently unable to find the second quarter numbers on the FEC's website.

Yet, when approached by the CT Dems with this information, this is how they update their post:

Update 5:25 p.m.: Connecticut Democrats have shared with us records not available on the FEC query cited above. Those records are being looked at now.

Wrong. Those records are available at the FEC.

Here's how you do it, anonymous WTNH blogger:

1. Go to fec.gov.
2. Click on Campaign Finance Reports and Data, and then View Images of All Financial Reports
3. Type in "Dodd". Click "Get Listing"
4. Click on "Friends of Chris Dodd"
5. Click on PDF under the entry "JULY QUARTERLY" for 2009.
6. Click "Generate PDF"
7. If you find you still need remedial help in learning how to count, try this:

The level of defensiveness and sheer ignorance on display by WTNH is jaw-dropping.

Update 6:17pm: The post on WTNH is quickly being edited, including the title. A screencap of the original post is below the fold.

Update 7:04pm: And if you wanted to leave a comment on WTNH's Connpolitics.tv to let the proprietor there, "ConnPolitics.tv editor," know that he or she is wrong, forget about it:

Comments are closed for this post.

Update 7/22 9:05am: Jeff Bailey at WTNH responds in the comments:

Yep, I made an incorrect assumption that a link marked "itemized individual contributions" available on Sen. Dodd's FEC page was up to date. It was not. I should have looked more closely at the dates on the FEC query. I didn't. And I should have left comments open. There should also have been a 'Contact' link. I'll rectify that when I'm done typing here.

In all, a pretty fair criticism here...

Much credit to Jeff and WTNH for coming here to post a mea culpa and correction.  

tparty :: Anonymous WTNH Blogger Reaches Stratospheric Levels of Dumb (Updated)
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
It's the liberal fruitloop candyasses fault (0.00 / 0)

Comment from: anonymous [Visitor] Email
Gary from Seymour... You nailed it. As long as Connecticut continues to support scum like Dodd, Michael Lawlor, Andrew McDonald, Steve Fontana or anyone with the (D) label by their name. They are all career politicians who have tenure and money and connections. Things will never change Because there are too many brain dead lemmings who are just totally retarded and do whatever Connecticut Citizen Action Group, My Left Nutmeg, The Connecticut Democratic Party, Democracy For America and all the other liberal fruitloop candya** groups tell them to do.
07/21/09 @ 17:42


Yeah, That Was A Funny One (0.00 / 1)
Too bad he's partly right. Now, i'll admit that I don't know who the other names after Mr. Dodd are, but I get the feeling that in earlier times Chris wouldn't be doing the things he is now that his career in the Senate is likely coming to an end. Here's a link:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn


[ Parent ]
Stick to 9-11 conspiracy theory (3.00 / 1)
because if you don't know who those other names are after Dodds you really should just lurk until you have enough knowledge to make comment here that doesn't deserve a big fat zero.

I guess I should have expected we'd attract the equivelent of the "Birthers" here but was hoping against hope you weren't that equivelent.

It sucks you've proven me wrong but you have.


[ Parent ]
C'mon Man (0.00 / 0)
Did you explore the link I put there? I'm skeptical about WAPO, but still..

We Deserve the truth about 9/11, because the hysteria spawned so many things that should not have happened since.

Please Keith, questioning the propaganda around 9/11 is so different than "birthers", "Moon Landing Deniers", Holocaust Deniers", "Bigfoot", etc. You sound like a neocon saying that, and I don't think you are. Here's another link to a hit piece put out by a Boston tabloid on this very subject:

http://www.examiner.com/x-1051...

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn


[ Parent ]
Don't forget (0.00 / 0)
vaccines cause autism. Jenny McCarthy says so, and she seems to be on the ball. All the "scientific medical studies" that demonstrate no significant causal relationship between vaccines and autism is only further PROOF that the pharma industry, entire medical community and Congress are in on the con. /snark

I read that examiner link, and I have to say I completely agree with its logic. (Emphasis in original)

Evolution is taught in schools because, like it or not, it suffers from the condition of being supported by factual data. It doesn't require belief. Belief is something that is done in absence of facts.

Eugenie Scott, one of the great defenders of evolution against intelligent design-creationism, likes to say in her talks that she does not believe in evolution (here the audience titters with shock) - for precisely the reason outlined above. As a biologist, and perhaps a future biology teacher, I also do not believe in evolution. It's not one of those things that require belief. When you get a PhD, you don't have to swear to a credo of belief in Darwin (or Mayer or Gould). It's a completely different way of operating in the world.

I always thought your Kierkegaard quote was kind of funny for that reason. If something is true -- actually, instead of the word "true" I would say, consistently verifiable among a community of observers, not as cute of a soundbyte, but I digress... As I was saying - if something is true, I am not compelled to "believe" it, and there is in fact no reason for me to say "I believe in evolution" or "I believe in a heliocentric universe" - because belief is what you do when you don't have enough evidence to know something.

The rest of the time, and on most issues - especially ones as emotional and meaningful as 9-11 or autism, I make a concerted effort to remain agnostic. I like to say "I don't know". Once in a while, for fun I will make a wild-ass-guess, or I may go with my gut for some truthiness, but I try to reserve that for sports prognostications and watching LOST. Also, my gut is not as gutty as Colbert's.  

"I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to it."

-Lawrence Summers


[ Parent ]
Thanks (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for remaining agnostic. Because this story is about Dodd, I won't waste the space here discussing the state of 9/11 research. That would be better done in a new Diary, which I shall write soon. And perhaps it's time for a new tagline too.

"If those in charge of our society...can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves." ~~Howard Zinn

[ Parent ]
I love you (0.00 / 0)
tparty. This is too hysterical.  

No Doubt (4.00 / 1)
This anonymous blogger will be working for the Hartford Courant within a very short period of time and  if this "blogger" is a young,goodlooking female with certain "assets" she'll be replacing Shelly Sindland on the Sunday political show on the Courants new partner TV outlet, FOX 61.


The real question (0.00 / 0)
(spin)
is how many residents of Dodd's hometown are part of that list of 465 individual contributors. And then, how many of those hometown residents are neighbors.

I bet we're talking near zero here.

Rob on the other hand has received no individual contributions outside Connecticut.

(/spin)


Crap research (4.00 / 2)
...will always yield crap results.

I'm saddened that WTNH has sunk to a level of journalism that simply uses the cut and paste function of their computers to reprint conservative slander.  

Jeez, even a simple Google search would have corrected their lazy reporting.  I guess that would have involved actual effort, though.


Connecticut Bob


From WTNH (4.00 / 6)
My name is Jeff Bailey. I work at WTNH and have been there since 1993. I am responsible for the "Stratospheric Levels of Dumb' posted on ConnPolitics.tv cited above.

Yep, I made an incorrect assumption that a link marked "itemized individual contributions" available on Sen. Dodd's FEC page was up to date. It was not. I should have looked more closely at the dates on the FEC query. I didn't. And I should have left comments open. There should also have been a 'Contact' link. I'll rectify that when I'm done typing here.

In all, a pretty fair criticism here.

ctkeith, while I am blonde, I'm a he, I have little hair left, no "assets" so to speak, and I have no desire to move to another TV station/paper/web site.

notcho, I recall seeing one donation record for East Haddam, and one for Chester in the second quarter document. Remember, donations under a certain amount don't have to be reported with names and towns.

Bob Adams, you're absolutely right. I blew it in this case. Bad research on my part, not a bad cut-and-paste job. I'm much better than this example would indicate.

Thank you for your time.


Thank you, Jeff (4.00 / 5)
I appreciate your candor and the way you're taking responsibility for the error.  It's all too common in online journalism for people to make egregious mistakes and fail to properly follow up on them.  In your case, you've done an admirable job owning up to it.  I admire your character for appearing here to make amends.

Thanks.

Connecticut Bob


[ Parent ]
 
3 user(s) logged on.
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Spotlight

Use the Spotlight tool to send a diary to offline journalists, with your feedback or suggestions.
(What is Spotlight?)


Search


   Advanced
My Left Nutmeg Feeds

Links
Connecticut's War Dead

MLN Facebook Group

Blogroll
Powered By
- SoapBlox

Connecticut Blogs
- Capitol Watch
- Colin McEnroe
- Connecticut2.com
- Connecticut Bob
- ConnecticutBlog
- CT Blue Blog
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CT Smart Growth
- CT Voices for Civil Justice
- CT Voters Count
- CT Weblogs
- CT Working Families Party
- CT Young Dems
- Cool Justice Report
- DanMalloy.com
- Democracy for CT
- Drinking Liberally (New Milford)
- East Haven Politics
- Emboldened
- Hat City Blog (Danbury)
- The Laurel
- LieberWatch
- NB Politicus (New Britain)
- New Haven Independent
- Nutmeg Grater
- Only In Bridgeport
- Political Capitol (Brian Lockhart)
- Rep. David McCluskey
- Rep. Tim O'Brien
- State Sen. Gary Lebeau
- Saramerica
- Stamford Talk
- Spazeboy
- The 40 Year Plan
- The Trough (Ted Mann: New London Day)
- Undercurrents (Hartford IMC)
- Wesleying
- Yale Democrats

CT Sites
- Clean Up CT
- CT Citizen Action Group
- CT Democratic Party
- CT For Lieberman Party
- CT General Assembly
- CT Secretary of State
- CT-N (Connecticut Network)
- Healthcare4every1.org
- Judith Blei Government Relations
- Love Makes A Family CT

CT Candidates
- Joe Courtney (CD2)
- Jim Himes (CD4)
- Chris Murphy (CD5)
- Jonathan Harris (SD5)
- John Hartwell (SD26)
- Tim O'Brien (HD24)
- Matt Lesser (HD100) - Deb Heinrich (HD101)
- Lonnie Reed (HD102)
- Di Masters (HD111)
- Michelle Mount (HD112)
- Kim Fawcett (HD133)

Other State Blogs
- Alabama
- Arizona
- California
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New York
- North Carolina
- Ohio
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin

More blogs about connecticut+politics.
Technorati Blog Finder


 
Powered By
MLN is powered by SoapBlox
 
Return to front page

Powered by: SoapBlox